The concepts of sacred and profane are central to Émile Durkheim’s philosophy, yet many individuals working on shaping their own philosophy of life may not fully grasp their significance. Understanding these ideas is crucial, as they play an important role in influencing how we approach and develop our personal philosophies. This article provides an introduction to Émile Durkheim’s philosophy, examines the meaning of sacred and profane, and discusses their relevance to the broader process of forming a philosophy of life.
Key features of Émile Durkheim’s philosophy
Émile Durkheim was a French sociologist known as one of the founding figures of modern sociology. He focused on understanding how societies maintain order and cohesion, even as they grow more complex. One of his key ideas was the concept of the “collective conscience,” which refers to the shared beliefs, values, and norms that bind people together in a community. Durkheim believed that these shared ideas were essential for social stability.
Another important part of his philosophy was his study of social facts. These are the rules, customs, and structures that exist outside of individuals but influence their behaviour. For example, laws and traditions act as social facts because they shape how people act in society. Durkheim’s work highlighted that these elements are critical in understanding social life.
Free 4-week microlearning online philosophy courses for all levels.
- Curiosity Unleashed 1: Philosophical Inquiry, Nature of Reality, Knowledge and Free Will
- Finding Your North Star 1: Philosophy for Purpose, Socrates, Aristotle on Happiness, and the Stoic Mindset
- Critical Thinking 1: Introduction, Arguments and Logic, Logical Fallacies and Evaluating Evidence
Durkheim also explored the idea of anomie, a state of normlessness or lack of social regulation, which he believed could lead to social instability. He argued that rapid change in society, such as during times of economic or technological upheaval, could disrupt the balance, leaving individuals feeling disconnected and purposeless.
Overall, Durkheim’s philosophy emphasized the importance of studying society as a whole to understand the forces that hold it together or cause it to break apart. His work laid the foundation for sociology as a field and continues to influence how we study and think about societies today.
What is sacred vs. profane?
Émile Durkheim, a prominent sociologist, offered a key perspective on the concept of sacred versus profane in his studies of religion and society. He believed that all aspects of life could be classified into these two broad categories. The sacred refers to things that are extraordinary, set apart, and hold a special significance within a culture or belief system. These are treated with reverence, awe, and respect because they are seen as connected to the higher or spiritual aspects of life. On the other hand, the profane represents the ordinary, everyday elements of life. These are the practical, mundane, and routine aspects of human existence that lack any special symbolic or spiritual meaning.
Durkheim emphasized that the distinction between sacred and profane is not a universal or fixed separation but is shaped by the collective beliefs and practices of a society. What one group considers sacred may be regarded as profane by another, showing how these definitions are socially constructed rather than inherent. This division, according to Durkheim, is fundamental to understanding religion and the way societies organize and give meaning to their world. By creating this dichotomy, societies establish shared symbols and practices that help them maintain cohesion and collective identity.
An example that demonstrates this philosophical perspective is particularly enlightening. One instance of Émile Durkheim’s view about the sacred versus the profane can be seen in the way traditional societies view rituals. For example, a ceremonial gathering such as a tribe celebrating its connection with a totem animal shows how certain objects, symbols, or actions are deemed sacred and separate from ordinary life. The totem itself may not be inherently special, but through collective belief and reverence, it becomes a symbol of unity and something to be venerated. On the other hand, everyday tasks like gathering food or building a shelter are considered profane and part of ordinary daily existence with no spiritual essence. This contrast highlights how societies distinguish and elevate certain symbols, giving them a profound communal significance, while other activities remain rooted in practicality and routine. These distinctions shape social cohesion and collective identities.
Challenges to Émile Durkheim’s view about sacred vs. profane
Some philosophers object to Émile Durkheim’s ideas about the sacred and the profane for several reasons, often tied to disagreements about his approach and conclusions. One common criticism is that Durkheim’s theory relies too heavily on social constructs as the basis for understanding religion. By focusing primarily on the role of collective society in defining what is sacred and what is profane, critics argue that he overlooks individual spiritual experiences and the deeply personal nature of religious beliefs. Philosophers who emphasize individualism see this as an oversimplification of religion and its diverse expressions.
Another objection comes from those who view Durkheim’s ideas as overly rigid or reductionist. They argue that categorizing elements of life as either sacred or profane creates a binary that does not capture the complexity and fluidity of human experiences. Some thinkers suggest that many aspects of life exist on a spectrum rather than fitting neatly into two opposing categories. This rigidity, critics claim, may limit our understanding of how people experience the world and find meaning in ways that transcend simple classifications.
Furthermore, some philosophers take issue with Durkheim’s emphasis on cultural relativism. By suggesting that the concepts of sacred and profane are entirely shaped by the beliefs and norms of individual societies, critics worry this approach might undermine the universal aspects of human spirituality. These philosophers believe that certain core spiritual or existential questions are shared by all people, regardless of culture or society, and that Durkheim’s focus on societal context risks ignoring these commonalities.
Lastly, Durkheim’s approach has been criticized for being overly focused on traditional, organized religion while neglecting newer or more informal forms of spiritual expression. Philosophers who study the evolution of religion highlight that spirituality is constantly changing and taking on new forms that may not fit Durkheim’s framework. They argue that his ideas may not be able to fully explain modern developments in spirituality, such as secular rituals or the growing popularity of non-religious practices like meditation.
These objections reflect broader philosophical debates on the nature of religion, society, and individual experience, showing that while Durkheim’s ideas are influential, they remain a topic of significant discussion and critique.
Why sacred vs. profane is important to Émile Durkheim’s philosophy
These are some of the main reasons why grasping the concept of sacred versus profane is essential to comprehending Émile Durkheim’s philosophy.
- Understanding Social Cohesion
The concept of sacred versus profane is significant for exploring how societies maintain cohesion. By separating certain objects, practices, or ideas as sacred, societies create a shared sense of reverence and community belonging. The sacred serves as a focal point for collective rituals, which strengthen group identity and mutual trust. These rituals give individuals a sense of connection to something larger than themselves, promoting solidarity even among diverse members of a community. Without recognizing this dynamic, it becomes difficult to grasp how societies stabilize and form collective bonds.
- Interpreting Moral Frameworks
The distinction between sacred and profane helps explain the moral codes that guide human behavior. Sacred elements often carry moral weight, representing ideals or values that individuals strive to uphold. These moral frameworks, rooted in shared beliefs about what is sacred, shape decision-making and influence how people interact with one another. This framework creates a structure for understanding both acceptable and unacceptable behaviors, fostering a sense of order and continuity within social groups.
- Linking Religion to Society
The sacred versus profane distinction is crucial when analyzing the role of religion within a society. Even though not all sacred things are religious in nature, religions often rely on this duality to define holy objects, spaces, or rituals. This connection between sacred elements and religious practices reveals how deeply intertwined religion is with cultural and social systems. By focusing on what each society identifies as sacred, it becomes easier to explore the intersection of belief systems and societal organization, providing insights into the role of religion in shaping collective life.
- Understanding Symbolism
Symbols play a critical role in differentiating the sacred from the profane, and the focus on this idea highlights the importance of symbolic representation in human culture. Sacred symbols—whether they are physical objects, words, or gestures—carry significant meaning and evoke emotional responses. They serve as tools for communication within a group, helping individuals make sense of their world and affirm their connections to shared values. Recognizing this symbolic dimension provides insight into the ways people assign meaning to their environment and rituals.
Contrasting Émile Durkheim’s philosophy with Karl Marx’s philosophy
Émile Durkheim’s distinction between the sacred and the profane highlights his focus on societal cohesion and collective consciousness, which sets his views apart from Karl Marx’s philosophy. For Durkheim, the sacred represents things set apart and forbidden, inspiring awe and reverence, while the profane relates to the ordinary, everyday aspects of life. This division underscores how shared beliefs and rituals around the sacred create a sense of unity and structure within a society. Durkheim emphasizes religion as a social phenomenon that reinforces collective bonds and maintains order.
On the other hand, Karl Marx views society through the lens of class struggle and material conditions. Marx sees religion not as a source of social cohesion but as a tool used by the ruling class to maintain dominance and control. For Marx, religion serves as an “opiate of the masses,” providing comfort to the oppressed while obscuring the realities of economic exploitation and inequality. Where Durkheim perceives religion and sacred practices as a foundation for societal stability, Marx critiques them as mechanisms of oppression that prevent social change.
These differing perspectives highlight the gap between Durkheim’s sociological focus on harmony and integration and Marx’s critique of power dynamics and inequality. While Durkheim aims to understand how shared beliefs sustain a functional society, Marx prioritizes the need to dismantle systems of exploitation to achieve social justice.
Sacred Vs. Profane, Émile Durkheim’s philosophy and the meaning of life
Reflecting on Émile Durkheim’s ideas about the sacred versus the profane can greatly impact the way we approach living a more meaningful life, regardless of whether we agree with his views. This reflection encourages us to examine the things we value most deeply and identify where we invest our time, energy, and emotions. Understanding what we consider sacred—those elements that hold deep personal or communal significance—can help clarify our priorities and provide direction in our daily lives. Similarly, questioning what we categorize as profane can prompt us to rethink how we engage with the more routine or mundane aspects of life.
One important benefit of considering this perspective is the way it nudges us to be more intentional. By stepping back to evaluate what we hold sacred, we gain awareness of what aligns with our sense of purpose. This could be a commitment to relationships, personal growth, spirituality, or even contributing to the well-being of others. Acknowledging these sacred elements allows us to integrate them more consciously into how we live, leading to a greater sense of fulfillment.
On the other hand, reflecting on the profane can challenge us to find meaning even in the less extraordinary aspects of existence. Much of daily life is spent in routines and ordinary activities, but viewing these as opportunities for growth and connection rather than as insignificant can transform how we approach them. For example, treating a routine task with care and attention may strengthen mindfulness, which itself contributes to a more grounded and meaningful life.
Furthermore, such reflection allows for deeper connections with others. Sacred values often involve shared beliefs or practices. By recognizing what is meaningful to the people around us, we can foster empathy and strengthen relationships. Even if we do not personally share the same views, understanding the sacred in someone else’s life encourages mutual respect and a sense of community.
Ultimately, whether we align with Durkheim’s notions or challenge them, the act of reflecting on what feels sacred or profane in our lives offers practical insights. It helps us to realign with what matters most while finding value in the everyday. These reflections enable us to live with a clearer sense of purpose, sensitivity, and balance, which are the foundation of a meaningful life.
Further reading
Durkheim, É. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris, France: Alcan.
Durkheim, É. (1995). Elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1912)
Alexander, J. C. (1988). Culture and society: Contemporary debates on the sacred and profane. Contemporary Sociology, 17(2), 139-142.
Lukes, S. (1973). Émile Durkheim: His life and work. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Mestrovic, S. G. (1993). The coming fin de siècle: An application of Durkheim’s sociology to modernity and postmodernism. London, England: Routledge.
Pickering, W. S. F. (1984). Durkheim’s sociology of religion: Themes and theories. London, England: Routledge.
Strenski, I. (2006). Durkheim and the birth of economic sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.