Skip to content
Home » Articles » Kierkegaard’s Philosophy and subjectivity as truth

Kierkegaard’s Philosophy and subjectivity as truth

get started - philosophies of life
More ideas on Instagram / X

This article aims to shed light on an essential aspect of Kierkegaard’s philosophy that often remains elusive to many seeking a more meaningful life through the study of philosophy. The concept of subjectivity as truth holds immense significance in understanding Kierkegaard’s philosophy and its practical implications for our pursuit of a meaningful existence. By delving into Kierkegaard’s philosophy and exploring the idea of subjectivity as truth, we can gain valuable insights that can profoundly shape our philosophical journey towards a more meaningful life. Let’s embark on this exploration together and uncover the profound relevance of these concepts in our philosophical quest.

Key features of Kierkegaard’s philosophy

Søren Kierkegaard, a Danish philosopher from the 19th century, is widely regarded as the father of existentialism. His philosophical ideas revolve around the individual, the importance of personal choice, and the subjective nature of truth. Kierkegaard’s philosophy can be summarized in several key features, expressed in accessible language:

  1. Subjectivity of Truth: Kierkegaard emphasizes that truth is a deeply personal and subjective experience. He argues that each individual has their own unique perspective and understanding of truth, which cannot be reduced to objective facts or universal principles.
  2. Existential Choice: Kierkegaard emphasizes the significance of making authentic choices in life. He believes that individuals should take responsibility for their existence and actively engage in decision-making, focusing on personal values and passions rather than conforming to societal expectations.
  3. Leap of Faith: Kierkegaard introduces the concept of a “leap of faith,” which refers to the act of making a decision based on a subjective religious belief or commitment, even when faced with uncertainty or lack of evidence. This leap represents a profound and personal commitment to one’s faith, transcending rationality.
  4. Dread and Anxiety: Kierkegaard explores the existential experience of dread and anxiety, emphasizing that they are inherent aspects of human existence. He suggests that confronting and embracing these feelings can lead to personal growth and a deeper understanding of oneself.
  5. Individual Authenticity: Kierkegaard champions the idea of individual authenticity, encouraging individuals to live in accordance with their true selves and values. He argues against conformity and encourages people to resist societal pressures in order to live a genuinely fulfilling life.

Through his philosophy, Kierkegaard encourages individuals to examine their subjective experiences, make authentic choices, embrace uncertainty, and prioritize personal growth and authenticity. It is within these realms that he believes true meaning and fulfillment can be found in life.

What is subjectivity as truth?

Kierkegaard, a Danish philosopher from the 19th century, had a unique perspective on the concept of subjectivity as truth. According to Kierkegaard, truth is not something that can be objectively measured or determined by external standards. Instead, he believed that truth is a deeply personal and subjective experience that resides within the individual.

Kierkegaard argued that each person’s subjective experience and interpretation of reality is their personal truth. He believed that truth is not something that can be universally defined or understood in the same way by everyone. Instead, truth is found within the individual’s own lived experiences, thoughts, and emotions.

For Kierkegaard, subjectivity as truth meant that individuals must trust their own inner voice and intuition to discover what is true for them personally. He emphasized the importance of self-reflection and introspection as a means of uncovering one’s own truth. Kierkegaard believed that through self-examination and deep reflection, individuals could gain a greater understanding of themselves and the world around them.

In Kierkegaard’s view, subjectivity as truth means embracing the uniqueness of individual experience and recognizing the inherent limitations of objective knowledge. It encourages individuals to value their own perspectives and embrace the complexity and richness of their own subjectivity. By doing so, one can cultivate a deeper sense of authenticity and find meaning and truth in their own personal journey.

The subsequent example vividly demonstrates this philosophical perspective. Now, let’s delve into an intriguing illustration of Kierkegaard’s view on subjectivity as truth. Imagine a person named Alex who is faced with a critical life decision. Instead of relying solely on external guidance or societal norms, Alex turns inward and listens to their own authentic inner voice. They embrace their personal values, desires, and experiences, recognizing the importance of subjective truths. In doing so, Alex finds a profound sense of purpose and fulfillment, steering their life path in alignment with their individuality and uniqueness. This example emphasizes Kierkegaard’s belief that true understanding and meaning can be discovered by embracing one’s subjectivity and personal perspective, rather than conforming to external standards or seeking universal truths. By valuing and trusting their own subjective experience, individuals like Alex can navigate life’s complexities with authenticity and find genuine fulfillment in their choices and actions.

Challenges to Kierkegaard’s view about subjectivity as truth

Some philosophers raise objections or reject Kierkegaard’s view on subjectivity as truth. They argue that this perspective is flawed for several reasons.

Firstly, critics argue that relying solely on subjective experiences and individual perspectives can lead to subjective relativism, where truth becomes purely subjective and lacks any objective basis. They contend that without an objective standard or criteria to assess truth claims, we risk falling into a subjective abyss where all perspectives are considered equally valid, even if they contradict one another.

Secondly, philosophers question the reliability and consistency of subjective experiences as a basis for determining truth. They argue that individual experiences can be influenced by biases, emotions, and personal beliefs, which can distort one’s perception of reality. They advocate for a more rigorous approach that incorporates critical thinking, empirical evidence, and logical reasoning to arrive at objective truths.

Furthermore, some philosophers argue that a purely subjective view of truth undermines the possibility of shared knowledge and communication. If everyone has their own subjective truth, it becomes difficult to engage in meaningful dialogue and reach consensus on important matters. They emphasize the importance of a shared understanding of truth that can be verified and tested through collective reasoning and shared experiences.

Moreover, critics of Kierkegaard’s view claim that it neglects the importance of objectivity in certain domains, such as scientific inquiry. They argue that in fields like physics, chemistry, and biology, objective facts and evidence play a crucial role in advancing knowledge and understanding the natural world. Subjectivity alone may not provide a reliable framework for making scientific claims or developing universal theories.

In conclusion, while Kierkegaard’s view on subjectivity as truth has its proponents, there are valid objections and critiques raised by other philosophers. These objections highlight concerns about the reliability of subjective experiences, the potential for subjective relativism, the importance of shared knowledge, and the value of objectivity in certain domains. Philosophical discourse thrives on exploring different perspectives and engaging in critical analysis, allowing for a deeper understanding of truth and its complexities.

Why subjectivity as truth is important to Kierkegaard’s philosophy

Understanding Kierkegaard’s philosophy hinges on grasping the importance of subjectivity as truth. This concept plays a pivotal role in comprehending the essence of Kierkegaard’s ideas and the profound impact they have on our understanding of truth.

  • Emphasizes Individual Experience: Subjectivity as truth in Kierkegaard’s philosophy underscores the importance of personal experiences and individual perspectives in understanding truth. By acknowledging that truth is subjective, Kierkegaard recognizes that each person’s unique experiences shape their understanding of reality. This perspective encourages a deep exploration of one’s own thoughts, feelings, and beliefs, fostering self-reflection and personal growth.
  • Recognizes the Complexity of Human Existence: Kierkegaard’s view of subjectivity as truth acknowledges the intricate and multifaceted nature of human existence. He argues that individuals are not mere observers of objective truths; rather, they actively engage with the world and interpret their experiences through their subjective lens. This recognition highlights that truth is not a singular, universal concept, but rather a complex interplay of individual perspectives and subjective realities.
  • Promotes Authenticity and Individuality: Kierkegaard’s philosophy of subjectivity as truth encourages individuals to embrace their own unique selves and values. By recognizing the validity of subjective experiences and perspectives, Kierkegaard emphasizes the importance of being true to oneself and living an authentic life. This perspective challenges individuals to reflect on their own beliefs and values, rather than blindly conforming to societal norms or external expectations.
  • Encourages Personal Responsibility: Subjectivity as truth in Kierkegaard’s philosophy places the onus of finding truth on the individual. It emphasizes personal responsibility in seeking and understanding truth, as each person is responsible for their own subjective experiences and interpretations. This perspective empowers individuals to actively engage in their own self-discovery and truth-seeking journey, fostering a sense of autonomy and self-reliance.
  • Allows for Diverse Perspectives: Kierkegaard’s philosophy of subjectivity as truth recognizes that truth can manifest differently for different individuals. This perspective embraces the richness of diverse perspectives and encourages open-mindedness and tolerance. By acknowledging and respecting the subjectivity of truth, Kierkegaard’s philosophy promotes a more inclusive and compassionate approach to understanding others and engaging in meaningful dialogue.

In summary, Kierkegaard’s idea of subjectivity as truth is important to understanding his philosophy as it emphasizes the significance of individual experiences, recognizes the complexity of human existence, promotes authenticity and individuality, encourages personal responsibility, and allows for diverse perspectives. This perspective invites individuals to explore their own subjective truths and engage in a deeper understanding of themselves and the world around them.

Contrasting Kierkegaard’s philosophy with Aristotle’s philosophy

Kierkegaard’s view on subjectivity as truth marks a significant departure from Aristotle’s philosophy. While Aristotle emphasized objective truths and universal principles, Kierkegaard emphasized the importance of subjective experience and individual perspective in the quest for truth.

According to Kierkegaard, truth is not something that can be discovered through rational and objective analysis alone. Instead, he argued that truth is a deeply personal and subjective experience that is contingent upon individual existence and lived experience. In other words, truth is not an abstract concept that can be universally applied; rather, it is intimately tied to the individual’s subjective interpretation and understanding of the world.

This perspective stands in contrast to Aristotle’s philosophy, which emphasized the pursuit of objective truth through reason and logical analysis. Aristotle believed that there are universal principles and truths that can be objectively known and understood through empirical observation and logical deduction.

Kierkegaard’s emphasis on subjectivity as truth highlights the importance of the individual in the search for meaning and truth. He argued that personal experiences, emotions, and relationships play a crucial role in shaping one’s understanding of the world. This focus on subjectivity and individual experience sets Kierkegaard’s philosophy apart from Aristotle’s more objective and universal approach.

In summary, while Aristotle sought objective truths based on reason and observation, Kierkegaard’s philosophy emphasizes the subjective nature of truth and the importance of personal experience. By recognizing the significance of subjectivity, Kierkegaard offers a unique perspective that acknowledges the diversity of individual experiences and the role they play in the search for truth.

Subjectivity As Truth, Kierkegaard’s philosophy and the philosophy of life

Reflecting on Kierkegaard’s view about subjectivity as truth and exploring his philosophy can have practical significance as you develop your own philosophy of life. Regardless of whether you agree with Kierkegaard’s perspective or not, engaging with his ideas can offer valuable insights and provoke thoughtful introspection.

By contemplating Kierkegaard’s thoughts on subjectivity as truth, you are prompted to examine the role of personal experiences, beliefs, and perspectives in shaping your understanding of truth and reality. This encourages you to delve into the depths of your own subjectivity and question the assumptions and biases that may influence your worldview.

In the process of developing your philosophy of life, it is crucial to critically evaluate your own beliefs and values. Kierkegaard’s emphasis on subjectivity prompts you to reflect on the authenticity and sincerity of your own convictions, and to consider how they align with your experiences, emotions, and personal growth. This self-reflection enables you to refine and define your own unique philosophy that resonates with your true self.

Engaging with Kierkegaard’s philosophy can also foster a sense of existential awareness and encourage you to confront the existential questions that arise in your own life. Contemplating the complexities of human existence, the pursuit of meaning, and the nature of faith and doubt can deepen your understanding of yourself and your place in the world. It challenges you to grapple with the uncertainties and paradoxes of life and empowers you to navigate the complexities of existence with greater clarity and authenticity.

Furthermore, exploring diverse philosophical perspectives, including Kierkegaard’s, broadens your intellectual horizons and exposes you to different ways of thinking and approaching life’s fundamental questions. This intellectual engagement expands your capacity for critical thinking, empathy, and open-mindedness, helping you develop a well-rounded and nuanced perspective on the world.

Ultimately, reflecting on Kierkegaard’s view about subjectivity as truth and immersing yourself in his philosophy can be a transformative journey of self-discovery and personal growth. It challenges you to critically examine your own beliefs, values, and assumptions, and empowers you to develop a philosophy of life that is authentic, meaningful, and resonates with your own unique experiences and aspirations.