Skepticism

Philosophy often serves as a guide for those seeking to live a more meaningful life, yet the sheer amount of information available can feel overwhelming. To truly benefit from philosophy, it is essential to return to its core principles. Among these is the philosophy of George Berkeley, which emphasizes the importance of relying on common sense. Understanding this concept can profoundly enhance how we apply philosophy to our lives. This article will explore Berkeley's philosophy, the role of common sense, and their significance in the search for a more meaningful existence. Key features of George Berkeley's philosophy George Berkeley was an Irish philosopher best known for his theory of immaterialism, which argues that the physical world does not exist independently of perception. According to Berkeley, objects only exist when they are perceived by a mind. This idea can be summed up in the phrase "to be is to be perceived" (esse est percipi). He believed that what we think of as material objects are actually collections of ideas that we experience through our senses. Berkeley rejected the notion that there is a physical reality beyond what we perceive. Instead, he suggested that all perceptions and ideas come from God, who ensures consistency and continuity in the world. For example, a tree in a forest doesn’t cease to exist when no one is around because God always perceives it. His philosophy challenged traditional views of reality and materialism, emphasizing the importance of the mind and perception over the material world. Berkeley’s ideas have left a lasting influence on metaphysics and epistemology and continue to be discussed and debated in modern philosophy. What is reliance on common sense? George Berkeley, an Irish philosopher, believed that common sense played a vital role in understanding the world around us. He argued that our perception of the world primarily depends on our senses and experiences. For Berkeley, the reality of any object or idea is tied to its being perceived. This means that an object exists because it is being experienced through sight, touch, or another sense. Common sense, therefore, helps us trust our perceptions and make sense of the environment. Berkeley felt that many philosophical arguments moved too far away from the simple and direct truths that common sense reveals. He criticized overly complex ideas that disregarded the straightforward experience of ordinary life. To him, avoiding such unnecessary complication and relying on what our senses tell us was a way to stay true to common sense. While Berkeley’s philosophy focused on this connection between perception and existence, it also valued clarity. He believed that common sense offers a clear foundation for understanding the world without the need for abstract or confusing theories. For Berkeley, trusting what our senses reveal to us, combined with logical thinking, was enough to comprehend the workings of reality. This reliance on common sense ultimately shaped his ideas about perception and truth. This example highlights and clarifies this philosophical perspective. Imagine looking at a tree in a park. According to George Berkeley, our experience of the tree—its green leaves, rough bark, and towering height—comes entirely from our senses. These qualities wouldn’t exist if no one perceived them. To explain this concept through reliance on common sense, Berkeley suggests that despite the abstract theory, people rely naturally on their everyday experiences to understand reality. For instance, if multiple people see the same tree, they all experience its qualities through perception, and this shared experience reinforces the reality of the tree. Berkeley’s view posits that common, everyday observation aligns with his philosophical idea that existence is tied to being perceived. This approach emphasizes the role of perception in understanding physical objects without needing complex reasoning, connecting philosophy to ordinary experience. Challenges to George Berkeley's views about common sense Some philosophers object to or reject George Berkeley's views about reliance on common sense due to concerns about the implications of his ideas and how they align with everyday reasoning. One frequent objection is that common sense relies heavily on the independent existence of physical objects, while many interpretations of Berkeley’s philosophy suggest that objects only exist as sensory experiences in the mind. Philosophers argue that this perspective undermines the straightforward notion of an objective, shared reality that common sense assumes. For example, if objects do not exist independently, it becomes difficult to explain how different individuals seem to perceive the same world in a consistent way, fostering doubt about Berkeley’s alignment with practical common-sense reasoning. Another reason for opposition is the fear that Berkeley’s philosophy may lead to skepticism rather than clarity. Critics argue that if we accept Berkeley’s views, we might begin to doubt the reality of anything beyond our subjective experiences. This skeptical spiral contradicts the very reliability and confidence that common sense provides. Philosophers claim that common sense is supposed to offer a grounding in the real world, but Berkeley’s ideas can seem to remove that grounding, replacing it with something ambiguous or overly reliant on perception. Additionally, some thinkers criticize Berkeley for overstating the role of perception in defining reality. Common sense often assumes a balance between what we perceive and the independent nature of objects, yet Berkeley’s philosophy appears to dismiss the latter entirely. Philosophers point out that this dismissal can stretch the concept of common sense beyond recognition, making it feel detached from practical, everyday reasoning. Finally, some critics believe that Berkeley’s approach overly intellectualizes common sense, complicating something that should be straightforward and accessible. Common sense, by its nature, is meant to reflect simple truths and practical understandings—ideas that any person can grasp without deep philosophical reflection. Philosophers argue that if Berkeley’s ideas require complex reasoning or detailed explanations to connect with common sense, they might miss the point of what common sense is fundamentally about. Why reliance on common sense is important to George Berkeley's philosophy Understanding the concept of reliance on common sense is crucial to gaining insight into George Berkeley's philosophy. Accessibility of Ideas Reliance on common sense makes philosophical ideas more accessible to a wider audience. This approach helps explain complex concepts in ways that are grounded in everyday experiences and observations, which makes them easier for people to relate to and understand. By focusing on ideas that align with basic human perceptions and intuitions, it becomes possible for individuals without extensive philosophical training to grasp important arguments. This simplicity can also bridge the gap between academic theories and practical realities, encouraging more engagement with philosophical thought. Foundation for Everyday Understanding Common sense provides a foundation for how people interpret and interact with the world around them. It serves as a shared framework that guides basic judgments and decisions. By rooting philosophical discussions in common sense, such ideas resonate more strongly with the way humans naturally process experiences. This reliance reinforces the importance of grounding theories in human perception rather than abstract, overly technical reasoning that might feel disconnected from daily life. Promotes Consistency in Thought Using common sense as a basis for philosophical exploration promotes logical consistency. Common sense offers a straightforward way of checking whether ideas align with observable reality and widely accepted truths. This reduces the risk of overcomplicating thoughts or creating contradictions. A philosophy centred around relatable and stable concepts invites clarity, helping people better follow the reasoning behind specific claims or arguments without becoming confused or lost in theoretical nuances. Contrasting George Berkeley's philosophy with skepticism George Berkeley’s emphasis on relying on common sense sets his philosophy apart from the traditions of skepticism, which often question the reliability of human perception and understanding. Skepticism, as a philosophical approach, tends to doubt the certainty of knowledge, arguing that human senses and reasoning are prone to error and cannot provide true or reliable insights into reality. Skeptics frequently highlight the limitations of perception and suggest that we cannot fully trust the data we receive from the world. Berkeley, in contrast, champions common sense as a foundation for understanding the world around us. While skeptics might argue that our senses deceive us, Berkeley leans on the everyday experiences and intuitions that most people accept as undeniable truths. For example, he believed that trusting what we observe and feel aligns with practical reasoning and helps to avoid the paralyzing doubt often associated with Skepticism. By affirming what appears self-evident, such as the existence of the world as it is perceived, Berkeley aims to provide a grounding perspective. This reliance on common sense allows Berkeley’s philosophy to maintain a sense of accessibility and practicality compared to Skepticism's tendency toward uncertainty and abstraction. His view suggests that comprehension of the world should be rooted in what appears obvious and direct to the human experience, contrasting sharply with the skeptical tradition's questioning of whether such comprehension is even possible. Reliance On Common Sense, George Berkeley's philosophy and the philosophy of life Reflecting on George Berkeley’s view about reliance on common sense is of practical importance when developing your personal philosophy of life because it encourages critical thinking and self-awareness. Whether you agree with his perspective or not, considering his ideas pushes you to question the assumptions you make about reality, knowledge, and the world around you. Often, people rely on societal norms or longstanding traditions to shape their beliefs, but taking the time to reflect on such ideas fosters a deeper understanding of your own values. Thinking about Berkeley’s emphasis on common sense can also help you clarify your approach to decision-making. Life is full of complex situations that don’t always have clear answers. Reflecting on how much weight you personally give to common sense versus other guiding principles, like intuition or logical reasoning, can help you refine your problem-solving methods. It can also lead to more deliberate choices that align with the kind of person you aim to be. Developing a philosophy of life isn’t just about abstract ideas—it’s about creating a framework for making everyday decisions. Additionally, engaging with Berkeley’s ideas reminds us to be mindful of how we interpret reality. The way you perceive and interact with the world shapes your experiences and understanding of life. Considering philosophical viewpoints, even those you disagree with, invites an open-minded engagement with different perspectives, which is vital for personal growth. It’s easy to take your perceptions and beliefs for granted, but reflecting on them allows you to recognize potential biases and blind spots. This process can lead to a more balanced, empathetic outlook, fostering stronger relationships and a greater sense of purpose. Ultimately, reflecting on and challenging ideas like those presented by Berkeley equips you with tools to develop your own philosophy in a thoughtful, meaningful way. It allows you to better understand how you process the world and provides insight into creating a life that is both intentional and authentic. By questioning, reflecting, and refining, you are not just passively inheriting philosophical ideas—you are actively shaping your own unique view of life. Further reading Berkeley, G. (1710). A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. London: Jeremy Pepyat. Berkeley, G. (1713). Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous. London: G. Strahan. Atherton, M. (1999). Berkeley's Revolution in Vision. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Berman, D. (1994). George Berkeley and Irish Philosophy. London: Continuum. Bettcher, T. M. (2007). Berkeley and common sense realism. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45(1), 103-119. Falkenstein, L. (2004). Berkeley on the language of nature and the objects of science. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 12(1), 65-88. Foster, J. (1982). The Case for Idealism. London: Routledge. Kline, D. T. (1987). Berkeley on common sense and skepticism. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 4(1), 1-15. Pitcher, G. (1977). Berkeley. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Pyle, A. (1997). Berkeley's Idealism and the Manifold Problems of Perception. London: Routledge. Rickless, S. C. (2013). Berkeley's Argument for Idealism. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. Stoneham, T. (2002). Berkeley's World. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Skepticism

George Berkeley’s Philosophy and reliance on common sense

David Hume’s Philosophy and skepticism